home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Don't Repeal the 22nd Amendment This Spring Do It for the Children

print view

Is Senator Schumer With Us or Against Us?

by Christopher Chantrill
March 12, 2006 at 8:12 am


SO, THE DUBAI port deal is off. The firestorm is over. What began, according to Newsday, at “the moment Chuck Schumer fielded a call from an Associated Press reporter asking New York’s senior senator to comment on an obscure plan to rejigger operations at six U.S. ports” has ended with the global best practice port operation company deciding not to invest in operating America’s ports.

That could end up being a real lose-lose proposition for the United States.

But it makes complete sense that a Democrat like Schumer should have led the opposition to the port deal. As a graduate of New York City’s Democratic school of politics he seems only to understand its savage culture of ambush accusations, political shakedowns, and unashamed support for rent-seeking special interests.

For the rest of us the question is the security of our ports. Can we trust a state-owned Arab company like Dubai Ports World (DP World) to operate our port terminals? It is a question that goes directly to President Bush’s challenge immediately after 9/11. “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”

That is what The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States had to decide: whether DP World should operate the six port terminals previously owned by foreign interest P&O Ports, based in the home of the British terrorists of 7/7.

That is what neoconservative godfather Norman Podhoretz was writing about in February 2002 Commentary when he called the war on terror: World War IV. Since at least 1848 the world has been split in two, between the camp that believes in a global commonwealth of contract and trust and the axis of evil that has revolted again and again against it. First it was Marx and Engels who led the revolt. Then it was the Fabians and the Progressives with their rational, factual socialism of compulsory schools and beneficial government programs. Then it was Adolf Hitler urging a return to blood and lebesraum. Then it was Stalin and Mao and their noble experiment in egalitarian nation-building. Now the spirited rich kids of Islam are leading the rebellion of World War IV.

So we ask the question: Is a firm like DP World with us or against us? Mr. President, Is It Safe?

Curiously, our American academicians have solved this problem. They have found why the global movement of contract and trust has won out again and again against the eternal gang of ruthless men. They have found this out by researching the Prisoner’s Dilemma. You know the setup. Two prisoners are confined in separate prison cells for questioning. The dilemma for each of them is: should he rat on the other prisoner or not? Should he cooperate with the other prisoner or defect and hope for a lenient sentence?

Back in 1984 Robert Axelrod from the University of Michigan announced a competition to devise an iterative strategy for winning the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Against all expectations the winner was a strategy called TIT FOR TAT. This strategy operated according to a simple rule. It started out by cooperating with the other prisoner, but thereafter always copied the other’s move. If he cooperated, TIT FOR TAT cooperated back. If the other prisoner defected, then TIT FOR TAT would defect right back. If you conduct this iterated strategy on the world, you will find that it creates islands of trust and cooperation that slowly grow and eventually take over the world.

You can beat TIT FOR TAT. In 2004 a team of students at Southampton University did it using a strategy of collusion between the prisoners, illuminating why we have laws against price fixing and insider trading.

TIT FOR TAT teaches that you should trust people who have demonstrated their trustworthiness.

Not surprisingly the huge international effort to improve the security of the cargo transportation system is working on the trust issue. It involves everyone from port operators to the U.S. government and the U.S. military-industrial complex. The core of the effort is to extend the borders of trust, to project its frontier way beyond the ports of the United States to the factories in China and East Asia where the goods for the world are produced and loaded into ocean containers. In this cooperative effort DP World, as a global best practice company in port security operations, is a trusted team member. For instance, according to Robert M. Green:

At the recently opened Pusan Newport in South Korea, DP World and tech partner Samsung of Japan worked with the Korean port authority to build a state-of-the-art security port.

Don’t expect a veteran New York City pol like Chuck Schumer to care about that. Opportunistic ambush, betrayal, and fleecing of honest businessmen—that’s what New York politics is all about, and always has been.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.




“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact