|Another Fine Mess||Half of High School Grads Fail Seventh Grade Math|
by Christopher Chantrill
August 26, 2007 at 6:10 pm
THE PEOPLE who run political campaigns are a special breed. It is a measure of their importance that they become political lightning rods. The Clinton-haters of the 1990s wouldnt have pursued President Clinton so much if he hadnt been such a superb political tactician. Todays Bush-haters hate Karl Rove for the same reason. It is hard for them to acknowledge that a guy with a 5 for 6 record in major elections is just flat-out good at what he does. They would rather think that he won by playing dirty.
But now Karl Rove is resigning, and Democrats are wondering, like Talleyrand, what he meant by that.
But where does that leave the conservative base and the Republican Party? Where shall we go? What shall we do?
Let us think about the future at three levels like good military planners: at the tactical level, the operational level, and the strategic level.
At the nuts-and-bolts level of practical politics the conservative movement is prepared with a full slate of policies to reform the welfare state, replacing its top-down one-size-fits-all government solutions with ideas that empower people. Whether its reforming Social Security, getting consumer choice into health care, or educational choice, conservatives are ready with good ideas to lead the American people to sunny green uplands.
At the operational level, the level of cultural criticism, the conservatives are also in good shape. For over a generation conservatives have been publishing trenchant critiques of the welfare state and the self-indulgent society. From George Gilders 1970s critique of feminism, Sexual Suicide, to Allan Blooms 1980s critique of elite education, The Closing of the American Mind,and on to the 1990s rise of post-feminist women: Maggie Gallagher The Case for Marriage, Carolyn Graglias Domestic Tranquility, Jennifer Roback Morses Smart Sex, Wendy Shalits Return to Modesty. Today there are even liberals raising questions about the benefit of extended adolescence and socialization of children in teenage gangs.
It is in the strategic realm of philosophy that conservatives lack heft. You can get a measure of the problem if you read The Modern Mind by British broadsheet journalist Peter Watson. His intellectual history of the 20th century is divided into major sections like Freud to Wittgenstein, Spengler to Animal Farm, Sartre to the Sea of Tranquillity, and The Counter-culture to Kosovo. Theres a clear message. Conservatives need not apply. Even at the second level in the table of contents the only recognizable names are Hayek and Nozick. There is no mention in the index of Buckley, of Kirk, or of Weaver.
The reason is fairly simple. We live, Jonah Goldberg writes, in a progressive world in which mankind, not God, is the pilot of Spaceship Earth. The Modern Mind is a progressive mind, molded by the French Enlightenment and German philosophy. If conservatives wish to advance from subculture to occupy the mainstream culture then we must master the language of the progressive world and its secularist canon from Kant to Gadamer and Habermas.
But is it possible to found a conservative response to the progressive world on Kant? Many conservatives look upon the entire German canon with undisguised suspicion as the fount of liberalism and relativism. Is there any point in learning the intellectual material that gave birth to socialism and the mammoth welfare state?
British conservative Roger Scruton has built his life upon just that. He has written a book on Kant and a textbook on Modern Philosophy. His conservatism, he writes in A Political Philosophy, arose in reaction to May 1968 in France. Indeed, on reading the conservative canon he found himself in the exact position of Burke, who was stunned into articulating his beliefs, as I was, by a revolution in France.
Thus Scruton found himself in 1996 in An Intelligent Persons Guide to Philosophy founding a conservative morality upon Kants categorical imperative and slaying the Cartesian egoand the whole cult of creativitywith the private language argument of Wittgenstein.
Does this matter, when conservatism is concerned with eternal values beyond the superficial games that academics play?
It certainly does. Conservatives have a compelling story to tell, a story of hope to inspire ordinary people to take control of their lives and escape the grim dependency and moral squalor of the welfare state.
What we need is a political philosophy with the power to propel conservatives from sub-culture to dominance, so that the chronicler of the Twenty-first Century Mind will find he is writing mostly about conservatives. We need conservative thinkers with the talent to inspire the twenty-first century doers.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization