|Class War||When's It Gonna End?|
by Christopher Chantrill
December 29, 2007 at 12:47 pm
THINK ABOUT this for a moment. Who is the one individual who has made the biggest difference in the world in the last year?
Thats the main criterion that Time magazine uses when selecting its Person every year. To quote, Time editors choose:
the man, woman, couple, group, idea, place, or machine that "for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year."
The answer is pretty obvious. It is President George W. Bush. He is not just Man of the Year. He is Man of the Decade. Whether it was the contested election of 2000, the response to 9/11, the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the mess in Iraq, and the surge, the guy in the middle was President Bush. Whether its the success of the 2003 tax cuts, the mess of No Child Left Behind, or the gigantic expansion of Medicare, the go-to guy is President Bush.
But of course, our objective journalist friends in the mainstream media would die rather than give President Bush the time of day. They figure that by making him Person of the Year in 2000 and 2004 they have eaten their broccoli. As composer Richard Strauss said:
Never look at the trombones. Youll only encourage them.
We certainly wouldnt want to encourage President Bush, now, would we? He might decide to go off and invade Iran.
Many conservatives would like to nominate General David H. Petraeus as Man of the Year, as a reward for commanding a successful surge that even the prophetic Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) failed to see in the stars. There is no doubt that General Petraeus head should be crowned with laurels.
We should remember that it is presidents that appoint generals, and that normally it takes a couple of years of war to find the right general. As often as not, hes commanding a division at the beginning of the war. Think Montgomery, Rommel, Manstein.
Some war winners start even further back in the officer corps. Ulysses S. Grant began the Civil War recruiting a company of volunteers. Eisenhower was a one-star general at the start of World War II. General Petraeus went into Iraq in 2003 as the commander of the 101st Airborne Division
It was Lincoln who picked Grant, Roosevelt who picked Eisenhower, and Bush who picked Petraeus. Lets give credit where credit is due to the president that hired the general.
The astonishing thing about President Bush is that, pace his critics, he has not presided over a White House bunker mentality. He has not held onto policies inflexibly without ever changing strategy when he needed to. He did not go into Iraq without a plan for the aftermath. He did not refuse to face up to his mistakes.
What he did do was to formulate a grand strategy in the aftermath of 9/11 and coolly execute it while all around him everyone started losing their heads over quagmires, blunders, mistakes, intelligence failures, domestic spying, and civil wars.
When things went wrong andearth to liberalsthey always do go wrong all the time in any serious endeavor, President Bush changed his strategy. Thats how you do things in the world of grown-ups as opposed to the adolescent world of taxpayer-funded liberal sinecures.
Conservatives are disappointed in President Bush. He hasnt advanced our program of reform as far as we would have liked, and we grumble that Ronald Reagan would have done better. We probably underestimate the achievements of Bush and overestimate the legacy of Reagan. We may come to recognize that Bush didnt do too badly, given the hand he was dealt and the ferocious opposition of the Democrats to any reform of their entitlements.
President Bush has sensibly not wasted his troops in fruitless attacks against the entitlement citadels. Indeed, after the skirmishes of the last few years it may be time for conservatives to mention the R word, and take the advice of the Duke of Wellington: to know when to retreat, and to dare to do it.
It takes daring to retreat because it exposes you the scorn of the armchair generals back home. Every army needs time to rest, retrain, and re-equip before a new advance.
That is for the future. For now, in this season of conservative discontent let us appreciate that in President Bush we have a leader who, while lacking the charm of a matinee idol, does not lack for courage, fortitude, coolness under fire, and a willingness to play big ball.
Yet all of his achievements and mistakes thus far may count for nothing. This holiday season the ship of state is tossing in a perilous mortgage meltdown. Will President Bush manage to navigate the economy through the narrow channel between the Scylla of credit collapse and the Charybdis of ruinous inflation?
If he fails, his name in history will connect with that failure, as Carter connects with Stagflation and Hoover with Depression.
If he succeeds, well remember President Bush, Man of the Year, for something else.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization