|Those Mean-spirited Liberals||New Hope for Global Warming Deniers|
by Christopher Chantrill
July 08, 2008 at 12:31 am
WE TALK a lot about choices in the United States, but what do we mean? Usually, we are talking about rights, as the the right to an abortion, or the right to choose a school for your child.
But real choice is about making hard choices; it is about recognizing that things cant go on the way they are any more. It is about being ready to give up something precious in order to go on at all.
In normal times, especially in the sunshine of Morning in America and its aftermath, the American people do not have to make any hard choices.
In the political sector that has meant that soft choices. Conservatives came and demanded that the nation fight the Cold War and the war on terror. Liberals came and demanded that the nation provide subsidies for inner-city homeowners. Conservatives demanded that marginal tax rates be lowered. Liberals demanded protection of the nations wild and scenic areas. Conservatives demanded that the Second Amendment meant what it said it meant. Liberals demanded that the US start to combat the threat of global warming. Everyone got a piece of the action; there were no hard choices.
That is why Senator Barack Obama has needed to flip-flop on Iraq, on Reverend Wright and, last week, on campaign financing and gun control. When running for the nomination of his party he told the Democratic base there was no need for tough choices. Now he needs to tell the average independent voter that there is no need for tough choices.
Any time you make a choice, that choice has consequences. In our personal lives and our families the consequences can occur within months. In the business world the consequences appear within a year or two.
But government is different. People can argue about consequences for decades. According to Charles Murray in Losing Ground, liberals knew that their Great Society programs werent working by 1970, five years after they declared War on Poverty in 1965. But it took 25 years before Newt Gingrich and the Republicans from the Class of 1994 managed to reform just one liberal welfare program. It was so much work that they decided to take a break from making hard choices. Anyway, once the federal budget got into surplus in the late 1990s everyone got into a spending mood.
Well here we are, its ten years later and a bunch of consequences are upon us, and someones going to have to make some hard choices.
Everyone is as mad as hell and they are not going to take it any more. Since it all happened on Bushs watch it stands to reason that he and the Republicans are to blame.
From an orthodox conservative perspective the nations problems all stem from clumsy government intervention in the market, the kind that liberals know and love. There are the endless subsidies for homeowners that direct a firehose of credit at the housing marketuntil the bubble bursts. Theres the Federal Reserve endlessly chasing the business cycle with exemplary bureaucratic clumsinessand periodic inflationary burps to cure credit indigestion. There are the environmentalist meddlings with the energy market that make it difficult to develop energy resources and impossible to build oil refineriesuntil $5.00 gasoline prompts a voter stampede to Drill, Drill, Drill.
But the American voters are not ready to agree with conservatives. Not yet.
That is why Democrats are planning to nominate Sen. Obama on an audacious hope for a change and Republicans intend to nominate Sen. McCain, their least conservative contender.
At a moment of threatening inflation, high gas prices, collapsing house prices, a threatening recession, and a difficult war, at least theres one candidate that is serious about one of the issues.
Win or lose in 2008 conservatives can take comfort. The hard choices are patient. They will wait for a new era of practical conservative reform.
Sooner or later the United States will have to make the hard choices needed to get to a sensible market-driven policy on energy, and conservatives will be there to help. Sooner or later the United States will have to make the hard choices needed to get to an education system in which parents decide what is best for their children. Sooner or later the United States will have to make the hard choices needed to get to a patient-directed health care system.
When it comes to the hard choices, conservatives have seen the future, and it works.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up
rather than learns... Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism