home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Beyond the Blame Game "Obama Doesn't Really Think This Way"

print view

Energy and Freedom

by Christopher Chantrill
July 29, 2008 at 9:15 pm

|

WHEN SINGER Jo Stafford and the Pied Pipers in Los Angeles got a chance to audition for the Tommy Dorsey big band in New York, they piled into a car and drove across the nation—in 1939. No doubt it was cheaper than taking the train.

When Jack Kerouac went On the Road in the late 1940s he went in a car. It wouldn’t have been quite the same if he’d taken the bus.

Cars have been useful to ordinary people too. When Americans have looked to buy a home they have often traded price for commute time. They decide how big of a home they want, and then start driving out of town knowing that the longer the commute, the lower the price.

Cars are freedom. Even back in the 1840s Thomas Cook could see that. Of course, in those days there weren’t any cars, but he arranged for a special train to carry him and 500 other temperance campaigners to a meeting eleven miles out of town.

As the Duke of Wellington complained, railways encouraged the poor to travel around needlessly.

Sooner or later, the powerful were going to try to put a stop to all this needlessness. It was a question of saving the planet. Rich, powerful people would travel around the planet on executive jets exhorting people to stay home and use mass transit. And if that didn’t work they had a old-fashioned backup plan: prophecy. Oil, the major transportation fuel, was running out, they preached. So it didn’t make any sense to look for it, since it was running out anyway.

This campaign worked like a champ for a while, for people naturally defer to their superiors, especially when they talk in a confident, superior way from a media pulpit. People decided it would be good to “go green,” especially if it meant buying a vanity car like the Toyota Prius.

But when gasoline reaches $4.50 per gallon then “going green” doesn’t do it. If you are a young singer, maybe you can’t afford to drive to that breakthrough audition. If you are a dental assistant, it means giving up your dream of a little acreage and a horse. What’s a few acres compared to saving the planet?

In his Farewell to Alms Gregory Clark reminds us that underneath all the innovation and the freedom of the modern capitalist world is one rather simple concept. It is the energy input from non-biological production. In the old days there was a limit to the energy that could be deployed for human use. It was limited to the output from organic agriculture.

Today things are different. We can mine and drill for energy instead of grow on farms. Remove that energy and we would still be better off than 200 years ago, but not much. There is a limit to a world fueled entirely by animal power and agriculture.

It is the concentration of energy in oil and in coal and, even more so, in uranium that enables us the ordinary Wal-Mart worker to enjoy luxuries hardly dreamed of by Egyptian pharaohs. So when planet-saving priests urge us to abandon highly concentrated energy that has transformed our lives and return to low-concentration energy sources like biofuels and wind power we may well believe that they are flying us up a box canyon.

When a pilot realizes he is flying up a box canyon with nothing but a rock wall ahead, he understands that he must abandon his natural precautionary principle—there are old pilots, bold pilots, but no old, bold, pilots—and take a big risk for once.

In the summer of Drill, Drill, Drill, the American consumer finds himself in a similar situation. He finds that the natural instinct of the powerful to increase their power by reducing his access to energy has him flying up a box canyon.

In Congress the high priests of carbon footprints and peak oil are still celebrating the Mass of global warming with its liturgy of carbon taxes, cap and trade, and wind and solar. But they are worried by the mob outside the door baying Drill, Drill, Drill. Are you afraid, Wolf Blitzer asked Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week?

PELOSI: You know, I mean, the point is, is we are putting forth the alternatives that we need to put forth, and that is, drill, use it or lose it. …

BLITZER: So let me get — will you allow this issue, offshore oil drilling, to come up for a vote on the floor of the House?

PELOSI: We’re going to exhaust our other remedies in terms of increasing supply in America by…

BLITZER: So the answer is no?

PELOSI: I have no plans to do so.

The text doesn’t quite communicate an embarrassed Speaker stumbling over her talking points and finally admitting that she has no intention of getting the ordinary people in America out of the energy box canyon.

But don’t lose hope America. It took six months of dithering before the Democratic Congress threw the trial lawyers under the bus and passed the update to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. How long will it take for Democrats in Congress to throw the environmentalists under the bus?

After all there is something more important than saving the planet. It is winning the next election.

Some people think that there is something more important than winning elections. It is an America where Jo Stafford and the Pied Pipers can still pile into a car and drive across the continent to audition for the Tommy Dorsey band. Because if freedom means anything it means an America where people don’t have to live in a liberal-approved townhouse and commute to work on a liberal-approved mass-transit system.

An America that is still strong and free would be an America where a dental assistant can aspire to a little acreage and a horse or two.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Taking Responsibility

[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Responsible Self

[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact