home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Obama and the Liberal Freeloader Culture The Instinct of the Clueless

print view

Take Me To Your Leader

by Christopher Chantrill
March 19, 2009 at 12:40 pm


PRESIDENT Obama and his enforcers are right. Rush Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican Party. And now that Bill Buckley’s gone, he’s the leader of the conservative movement too.

Technically, of course, you could say that the Republican Party doesn’t have a leader right now, and it won’t have one until its presidential nominee is picked in the summer of 2012.

But like it or not, Rush Limbaugh is Mr. Republican for the next few years. He, and not some politician, will be the face of the Republican Party and of conservatism.

Obviously the president and his political rottweilers think that Rush Limbaugh is a big fat juicy target for them to sink their teeth into. They have conducted polls, and the polls show that Limbaugh has high negatives and that independent women think he is too bombastic.

No doubt the Obamunists think that, by painting Limbaugh as the leader of the Party of No, they will intimidate Republicans into softening opposition to the president’s programs.

I say good luck to the president and his hunting dogs. But they shouldn’t forget that there’s a risk in hunting Rush Limbaugh.

If they challenge Republicans on courage and leadership, who knows, Republicans might one day surprise them.

The great elephant in the room of US politics today is that 99.9 percent of people are scared to death of being called a racist—or a sexist or a homophobe or exclusive or mean-spirited. That’s why liberals sic the rottweilers on anyone who dares to raise the mildest question about any government social program.

But Rush Limbaugh is not afraid. Or, at least, he acts as if he is not afraid.

There is a word that means: acting as if you are not afraid. That word is: Courage.

Now, nobody except Rush Limbaugh knows if he was just born with the courage to say on ESPN that Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb got a pass from the sports media because of his race. Maybe he had to teach himself to put up parodies on his show like “Barack the Magic Negro.” My own guess is that it’s a bit of both. Rush was ornery enough to drop out of college and defy his rather opinionated father. But Rush is also reported to be quite shy. By his own admission he had his chauffeur in Manhattan drive around the block a few times while he summoned up the courage to go in and meet Bill Buckley for the first time.

Courage is what you look for in leaders. Ronald Reagan had it. He had the courage to develop and hold on to his conservative agenda through the long years of ascent and through his tumultuous presidency. President Bush had it. He had the courage to invade Iraq and then the courage to implement the surge when “everyone” said that the Iraq war was lost.

We don’t know yet if Barack Obama has this sort of courage. The president has lived a rather sheltered life thus far, being helped along by well-meaning liberals. He never seems to have had a serious reverse to overcome. In this he unlike Rush Limbaugh, whose career as a radio personality was a failure until he started his local talk show in Sacramento in 1984.

We don’t have much of a record yet on President Obama. But we have one significant decision to analyze.

After the election in November 2008 the Obama team had a choice. It could have announced that, given the financial crisis, all bets were off. Job One would be the credit crisis. Until the crisis was over there would be no politics as usual. But the Obama team did not change strategy. It encouraged the Reid-Pelosi Congress to write a monster special-interest “porkulus” bill. It produced a federal budget that could have been written back in July 2008.

In President Bush and his Iraq strategy, our liberal friends analyzed this sort of behavior as “stubbornness” and “obstinacy.” They have not, of course, characterized the Obama transition in these terms. President Bush’s “obstinacy” took courage. President Obama’s steady-as-she-goes transition did not take courage. It might even suggest weakness.

So there’s a danger in the Obama team’s tactic of painting Rush Limbaugh as the leader of the opposition. People might find out how courageous he is. They might like that. They might even get to like the idea of No, not one dime more of my money.

Rush Limbaugh is setting a leadership example for all conservatives. Sooner or later, we conservatives are going to have to summon up the courage to say to the next liberal that calls us names: Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.

When we have summoned up that courage we will know that we are ready, once again, to lead the people of the United States, the last best hope of mankind on earth.

What is the point of being a Republican In Name Only, or even a Conservative In Name Only?

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.




The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact