|The Instinct of the Clueless||I Just Can't Take the Liberal Melodramas Any More|
by Christopher Chantrill
April 06, 2009 at 12:34 am
IT WAS ENCOURAGING this week to see conservative women leading in the Tea Party movement. In Orlando on March 21 the 4,000 strong tea party was organized by two friends, Lisa Feroli and Shelly Ferguson.
But the menu at tea was the regular guy stuff: guns and taxes.
Theres nothing wrong with guns and taxes and porkulus. The Democrats are wrong on guns and taxes and as they are on most other things. But the real battle is yet to come. The problem is not taxes or even the gigantic inauguration present the Democrats gave themselves using our money. The problem is one trillion dollars a year in government pensions, one trillion dollars a year in government health care, and nearly one trillion dollars a year in government education: the vast web of compulsory health programs, education programs, and welfare programs. This year, every year. As always usgovernmentspending.com tells the awful truth.
The narrative is that these programs meet the urgent needs of women: health care to help people who hurt, education to enliven the minds of our children, and compassionate relief to those in need.
We conservatives know that there is something horribly wrong with the welfare state. We oppose it for a variety of reasons. Perhaps we oppose it because know that you cannot have self-respect unless you do for yourself. Perhaps we hate the suffocating liberalism-with-everything. Perhaps we revolt at the anti-family ethos that comes with every government program. Perhaps it is because we must have freedom and know that you do not have freedom when you get your mess of pottage from the patronage of a politician.
But then there are the moderate women. They just live their lives accepting what the liberal welfare state serves up. They may not like the dishes on the menu. Somehow the offerings at the neighborhood school dont suit restless Brandon. They really ought to have a program that suits his kinetic personality.
Liberal women, of course, are merely practicing their religion as they ecstatically receive the sacraments of government health care, government education that are funded by our tithes. Though we should not bully them to abandon the faith of their mothers, although it would not hurt them to travel north from Sonoma, CA, to the ranch of socialist writer Jack London. In his flamboyant letter resigning from the Socialist Workers Party over 90 years ago in 1916 he wrote:
[L]iberty, freedom, and independence are royal things that cannot be presented to, nor thrust upon, races or classes. If races and classes cannot rise up and by their strength of brain and brawn wrest from the world liberty, freedom, and independence, they never in time can come to these royal possessions . . . and if such royal things are kindly presented to them by superior individuals, on silver platters, they will know not what to do with them, will fail to make use of them, and will be what they have always been in the past inferior races and inferior classes.
Well, its been a while since anyone on the left wrote like that. Probably its the effect on superior individuals of three generations of power, privilege, and sinecure.
Against the weight of faith and power and privilege our conservative tea party ladies are beginning a national conversation that come in its time to teach the liberal church ladies, as Voltaire once taught an earlier generation, to Remember the Crueltiesof a health care that does not care, an education that dumbs our children down, and a welfare system that destroys the fabric of human community.
Women want health care that cares about people. Health care cannot care while it operates as a vast government program in which politicians vie with special interests to distribute patronage to their supporters. How do we get from here to a system in which women can genuinely obtain the care they need for those they love?
Women want education that responds to the special needs of their children. Education cannot respond to special needs of children as a government program to service the education producer interests: teachers, administrators, book publishers, contractors, investment bankers, and the vast infrastructure of consultants and education experts. How do we get from here to a system that really cares about individual children instead of the latest fad of the education experts?
Women want welfare that helps people who are hurting, people in need. Welfare cannot do that while President Obama and the Reid-Pelosi Congress continue to roll back the most successful government reform of our lifetimes, the Republican reform of welfare signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton.
Of course, conservatives have some rather good ideas on health care, on education, and on welfare. They are not perfect, but they are a start.
Our tea party ladies are meeting to build a new movement. Their tea parties are a start, too.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization