|Breaking Liberal Taboos on Education||Turning On the Sixties|
by Christopher Chantrill
July 17, 2004 at 8:00 pm
THEY TOLD US it was coming. No sooner will we get gay marriage than the polyamory advocates would be knocking on our doors. And wouldnt you know, the polyamory folks recently got a respectful hearing atwhere would you thinkthe Unitarian Universalists.
It really is remarkable, how the Unitarians seem to be in on every disreputable idea that comes down the pike. Who can forget their role in the public education movement of the 1840s, when the Unitarians at Harvard hooked up with the Puritans and the socialists to cure the Irish Catholics of their Catholicism? Well, public education didnt do much for literacy and numeracy, but it did encourage the Catholics who, under the principle of first the school, then the church built an education system that remains clearly better than the tax-fed system that was built to humiliate them.
The liberal war on marriage issue confirms one of the inevitable truths of existence. Liberals demand absolute freedom to do the things they want, and they demand approval and subsidy too. Liberals demand absolute freedom for sexual license, under the banner of keeping government out of the bedroom. Some day, social scientists will solemnly study this Liberal Extended Adolescence Syndrome.
In the case of the relations between the sexes, those of us of a certain age recognize that sex is for the children, in the exact sense of the word. The production of children is the one thing needful, because without children the whole remarkable, indeed, risky scheme of sexual reproduction falls apart. In recognition of this fact, Nature has provided all living things with a powerful box of tools to help them focus on the all-important sexual cycle. For humans the whole life cyclefrom conception through birth to growth to pair formation, reproduction, nurturing of the young, and aginghas been socialized, that is, brought under the aegis of social cooperation, tradition, custom, and, in the bourgeois age, contract. There is a name for this socialized system. It is called marriage.
In Europe we have seen over the last generation a sudden collapse in child production. Conservative commentators have attributed this collapse to the anti-marriage culture. In Europe all sexual arrangements are given equal prestige with monogamous heterosexual marriage. Of course, it is impossible to separate the variables out, but the combination of delayed marriage, single parenthood, abortion, divorce, and now gay marriage combines to influence women to have fewer children. Many fewer children. Taken together, or considered separately, these trends amount to folly on a massive scale.
The conflict over human sexual relations puts conservatives into a head-on conflict with liberals, denying liberals what they want most of all: an absolute right to do anything they want in the bedroom. So let us take advice from the great military strategists and try the indirect approach. Let liberals screw up their lives, if they want. But just dont let them call it marriage. Let us combine in a vast right-wing conspiracy to deny them the the right to dignify their sexual follies as marriage. I propose folliage, pronounced foll-idge, but screaming on the printed page Folly-age.
If the liberals demand we bow and scrape before their folliage, and call it wisdom, let them. If they demand subsidies and taxes, they got it. If Katie Couric wants to thrill to the lucubrations of the folliage activists, be our guest. But let there be no doubt that what they are doing is folly, a great movement of self-destructive foolishness that attacks the very nature and intent of sexual reproduction.
But every so often we should slide a stiletto between the liberal ribs, to rile up our liberal lords and masters. If gays experience a life expectancy twenty years less than ordinary Americans, shouldnt we suggest a social program to improve their life expectancy, something perhaps a little more immediate than an eventual cure for AIDS? If it turns out that the children of lesbians are angy that their paternity was arranged by mixing together the semen from a couple of gay friends, shouldnt we wonder aloud about the positive self-esteem of such a marginalized group? Should we not demand a program of national registration so that every child is a wanted childwith a publicly acknowledged father? And given that children living with their married, biological parents have the best chance of escaping child abuse, shouldnt we design a comprehensive and mandatory program to maximize the number of children living with their married biological parents? And if, as studies show, married conservative women report the highest level of sexual satisfaction, shouldnt we do something about it, like, er, mention it in those all-important sex education programs that liberals are so keen on?
Let the liberals have their polyamory and anything else they want. But lets call folly by its real name: not marriage but folliage.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up
rather than learns... Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism