home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Made for Each Other The Children of the Welfare State

print view

Excluding Christianity Won't Work, Liberals

by Christopher Chantrill
December 14, 2003 at 7:00 pm

|

EVERY YEAR around Christmas, the left moves the yard markers a little further on its campaign to remove Christianity from the public square. This year, some tender shoots in the IU-Purdue University at Indianapolis School of Law, students and a professor on sabbatical, complained about a Christmas tree display in the lobby of the school. And at an unnamed department at the University of California, Davs, they have decided to rename the “Holiday” party as the “Annual” party.

They really are something, our liberals, aren’t they? If we celebrate something that liberals don’t like, then we have to stop because liberals feel excluded. But woe unto anyone who doesn’t celebrate what liberals want to celebrate. Because then you are a sexist, a racist, or a homophobe. Then you are too eurocentric, and lacking in sensitivity for other cultures and lifestyles. Then you are guilty of failing to celebrate diversity.

Remember back in the Seventies, when radical students were burning, baby burning, and feminists were the roughest, toughest kids on the block. Then they made a fuss out of being “in your face.” Now all of a sudden, liberals are desperately fragile. They might break if they have to pass by a Nativity scene or be confronted by a Christmas tree as they hurry through a lobby on the way out to Starbucks. What could have gone wrong? How could the robust demonstrators and activists have withered into the shrinking violets of today? Is it Rush Limbaugh? Is it Jerry Falwell? Who could have reduced our rambunctious rebels of yesteryear into simpering wallflowers?

Now it’s conservatives that are playing at Rambunctious Rebels. No sooner had the news broken about the excluded victims of IU Law School than talk show host Greg Browning organized a Christmas Tree Brigade to circle IU Law with trucks, vans, SUVs and Christmas trees. “HONK IF YOU/LOVE/CHRISTMAS TREES/END PC NOW” said one protester’s reader board.

Of course, conservatives should fight these hypocritical liberals and expose them to the klieg lights of ridicule and publicity. It is good for pusillanimous university bureaucrats to have to worry about angry conservatives; they should have to work for their pensions. But driving Christmas out of the public square is not going to help advance the progessive millennium. Tactically, it may score a few points, but strategically, it’s meaningless. After all, the American elite has never really liked Christmas anyway. A generation ago they pulled the plug on outdoor Christmas lights. It took a decade before outdoor lights came back, bigger than ever.

Nor will the elite succeed in defeating the target behind Christmas, enthusiastic Christianity. Christianity has never needed elite sponsorship. In fact, it seems to thrive on elite disapproval

In the eighteenth century, the powers-that-be strongly disapproved of the Great Awakening and the mesmerizing preaching of George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards. In the early nineteenth century they complained about the revivalism of Lyman Beecher and Timothy Dwight, and sneered at the uneducated Methodist circuit-riders who doubled the rate of church adherence in half a century. In the latter half of the nineteenth century the Protestant elite tried everything to head the Catholics off at the pass, including a frankly anti-Catholic public school system. So Archbishop “Dagger” John Hughes and the New York Irish built their own schools, and erected Saint Patrick’s Cathedral right on Fifth Avenue so that the Astors and the Morgans couldn’t miss it.

In our own time we have seen another eruption of Christian enthusiasm, beginning about the time in 1965 that Time magazine declared, a century after Nietzsche, that God was Dead.

Why is it, liberals, that after a century of your Social Gospel, people still flock to enthusiastic Christianity, and a new Pentecostal church opens in New York City every three weeks? Why is it that the Anglican Church in Nigeria has more members than in Britain and the United States together? Why is it that people in Latin America are increasingly walking past the Catholic Church next door to city hall in the Plaza de Armas to the storefront Iglesia Cristiana Pentecostes a couple of blocks away down a side street. Why have up to 80 million Chinese people started worshipping Christ in the “house church” movement?

While you are pondering that, why don’t you just leave Christmas alone? Otherwise in twenty years presidential candidate Chelsea Clinton may find herself echoing Howard Dean, and promising to take our Christmas trees back from Sean Hannity Jr. and Rick Warren Jr.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Responsible Self

[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


Taking Responsibility

[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact