home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Let's Stop Obama-ing Apart A Budget Rear-view Mirror

print view

Liberals Forced to Bare Their Teeth

by Christopher Chantrill
February 17, 2012 at 4:42 pm


LIBERALS WERE a sorry spectacle this month, when they were forced to bare their teeth on the Planned Parenthood / Komen caper. A real hegemonic ruling class at the peak of its power doesn’t need to make threats. Its natives don’t even think about getting restless.

That, after all, is why liberals invented Political Correctness. Every American pretends to sneer at Political Correctness, but every American knows better than to say anything politically incorrect, else he’ll find the local liberal enforcer paying a visit, and everyone in America knows what the PC enforcer can do to you. She can brand you with the liberal mark of Cain--racist, sexist, homophobe--and that could pitch you out of college or out of a job. Political Correctness, or Chicago politics, or any other protection racket works best when Mr. Big never has to send the thugs around to make explicit the crude intimidation of “nice little column you got there...”

But once the Raj’s local District Officer gets afraid and tells Superintendent Ronald Merrick to order a police lathi (or Indian police baton) charge, well, then the end of the empire is just a matter of time.

And that’s where liberals are today after the lathi charge on Komen and the fake retreat on the Catholic health insurance blunder. American women that don’t want liberals legislating a culture of death over their families should know what’s what. Faithful Catholics that continue to vote for Democrats have to ask themselves: What was the point of “Dagger John” Hughes, first Catholic Archbishop of New York, teaching the WASPs the time of day a century and a half ago, what was the point of building the Catholic school system to which the nuns devoted their lives, if today’s Catholics just knuckle under to a new era of anti-Catholic bigotry?

And for what are people supporting the Democrats? It’s not as if they will have much loot to hand out, not after the government’s finances go Greek on us.

Even here in India (where I’m vacationing for three weeks) liberals are worrying about the future of government programs. Sunil Khilnani writes in the Times of India about the problem of delivering policies over government’s “last mile.” India’s capital throbs with great ideas and policies, he writes, but nothing seems to change.

The core problem, in domain after domain of social policy, lies in the inability to bridge that last mile - to translate intention, law and resources into outcomes that improve individual opportunities. Take for instance the case of primary education. We have fine legislation in place that establishes a right to basic education.

And yet, as we know from a series of recent reports, the gains across India’s school-bound young in literacy and numeracy are shockingly poor and depressing. It’s that last mile - delivering the actual classroom lessons that improve learning and the capacity to learn - which is the weakest link.

Now Khilnani is a good, faithful liberal teaching at King’s College in London, and there’s a charming naivete in his faith in “intention, law and resources.”

But if you want to deliver any service over the “last mile” you need a system that succeeds or fails on how it actually delivers to real citizens at the other end of that last mile. In politics, the last mile is not the delivery of literacy and numeracy to school children, or even “reproductive health” to at-risk women; it is getting that last one percent to win the next election or buying the last vote to pass a bill.

When he was running for president Barack Obama used to talk a lot about his “faith tradition.” Well, I have a faith tradition too. It is called American exceptionalism, and I’ll put it up against the president’s faith tradition any day. My faith tradition says that when America needed someone to clean up the Revolutionary War debts and put the national economy on a sound footing it got Alexander Hamilton. When it needed a president to end the suppurating wound of slavery it got Abraham Lincoln. When it needed a president to show liberals that their politics and their economics stank it got Ronald Reagan.

Back in 1860 the South gagged on Lincoln they way that the rest of the nation gagged on the stench of gangrene from America’s Original Sin. In the 1980s liberals were the real amiable dunces that wouldn’t read the verdict on Keynesianism and government dependency. So now liberals are going to have to learn the hard way. Just like the South did between 1860 to 1960.

Baring their teeth to the breast cancer folks and faking out the liberal Catholics ain’t gonna save them. When America needed a president to show that liberalism was past its sell-by date, it got Barack Obama.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.




The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact