|If Conservatives are Social Darwinists, then...||Liberals Ruin Everything|
by Christopher Chantrill
May 09, 2012 at 12:00 am
I JUST HOPE the Obamis are as stupid as we conservatives imagine. Because it would be too bad if the Life of Julia turned out to be a cunning Chicago buffalo jump, stampeding conservatives into jumping to red ruin in November. Thats what Ross Douthat suspects.
Is this what liberation for women amounts to? A government-centric life sequestered away from the hurly-burly of modern life in the governments welfare-state harem, voting for metrosexual liberals to tax men and supply women with the goods their hearts desire: health care, education, and welfare? Maybe its the closest well ever get to a matriarchy.
The telling commentary on Life with Barack was not Julias mechanical relationship with her distant Uncle Sugar but girl-friend Genevieve Cooks relationship with a Distant Man, even though it was likely all cooked up by the Obamis and fed to friendly journalists.
Maybe nothing has changed. Jane Austens Lizzie had to sit around waiting for Mr. Darcy to show up. Now Mr. Darcy is all over her like a cheap suit, but she is still waiting around for him to pop the question.
Be careful what you wish for. Women have indeed been liberated by reliable contraception and the A-word. But for what? Men have always wanted to get laid, and women have always wanted to be loved. The old deal was that women gave sex in order to get love and men gave love in order to get sex. Any resulting children were a joint responsibility. Today men are getting laid and women are pining for love and wondering what went wrong.
So here we are, 50 years after the Baby Boom invented sex, and nothing has changed. Men still want to get laid, and women still want to be loved.
How can a girl find true love in the 21st century? My daughter Beatriz Williams, with her debut novel Overseas out on May 10, has come up with an ingenious answer. Her 21st century heroine Kate Wilson finds that she has to go back to World War I to find the kind of man who will last a lifetime. What a coincidence that her novel is coming out in the week of Genevieve Cooks Dear Diary scribbles about her distant Barack and right after the second winter of Downton Abbey in which Matthew finally becomes a man in the trenches of Flanders and Lady Mary becomes a woman finally capable of love through devoted nursing of the war-broken Captain Crawley.
What is Kate looking for? Could it be the code of the gentleman that James Q. Wilson argues was the most successful extralegal mechanism ever invented for adapting male behavior to the requirements of modern life?
There is in the relationship between women and the welfare state a profound disconnect. Women are all about connection and relationship, sympathy and sharing. But the bureaucratic welfare state is all about rules and qualifications. Little boys, not little girls, writes James Q. Wilson in The Moral Sense, like to play games with complicated rules.
When Jean Piaget observed boys and girls at play, he noticed that boys were more concerned with rules, and girls with relationships. When a dispute arose, the boys were more likely to argue about the rules and search for fair procedures for applying them, while the girls were more inclined to manage conflict by making exceptions to the rules or ignoring them completely.
You can see the irony. The party that cares for women is dishing up bureaucratic rules, utterly devoid of love and sentiment, while the young women servicing its up-and-coming hopefuls are expected to lie back and think of Rights and Equality.
How can modern women stand the Life of Julia with its rigid bureaucratic rules, or the life of Genevieve, with its non-committal, distant men?
Maybe the welfare state works pretty well for college-educated Julias. But we already knew, from Charles Murray, that the upper 20 percent were doing fine. Its the bottom 30 percent thats been blitzed by the liberal neutron bomb. Remember the neutron bomb? Liberals were outraged that it killed people while leaving the buildings alone. This one is different. It destroys civil society while leaving the poor naked and on their own.
So much for the women of the welfare state. Im more interested in what conservative women are cooking up in the kitchen. Unlike Obamas women I suspect they reject the choice between ecstatic chaos as a liberal floozy and lifeless mechanistic order as a welfare-state dependent. They are nurturing something nobler and higher in their hearts.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital