home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

How Liberals Screw the 47 Percent Pundits Worry About Conservatism. Again

print view

October Political Reality Check

by Christopher Chantrill
October 09, 2012 at 12:00 am

|

AFTER THE PRESIDENT’S meltdown in Denver last week, liberals were furious that he didn’t fling the celebrated 47 percent gaffe in Romney’s face. And maybe they are right, as Mitt Romney has since said he was “completely wrong” about the 47 percent that will never vote for him.

Or is the 47 percent issue just another liberal fantasy, the idea that you can win elections by zinger?

The problem is, with all the noise of pushmi-pullyu polls and the deafening roar of the anti-Romney media artillery, how do you know what’s really going on?

Are the +9 Democratic polls just propaganda or a measure of Democratic enthusiasm? Are we getting signal from the early voting statistics in North Carolina, or do Republicans normally vote first?

The one thing that has impressed me this year is the intensity of the mildly economic conservative, but solidly socially liberal baby-boomers I know. If you filter out the dog-on-the-roof liberals, you get a clear signal that a lot of people are determined that this guy has got to go.

This baby-boomer angst is understandable. Our cunning plan to coast through our retirement and then hand the mess to our children has gone the way of all cunning plans. There is now a strong chance that the world will go to hell while we are still alive.

Baby boomers realize it’s time for a reality check.

But really, we all live in a fantasy world. Here is Lee Habeeb reporting on liberal prof Alan Wolfe explaining away the news that conservatives give more to charity.

People in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits[.]

Earth to liberals. Government is force. When you vote for higher taxes you vote for more force. “Charity” comes from the Latin caritas, and St. Thomas said it meant the “friendship of man for God,” not the good feelings liberals get from taxing the rich.

Then there are Frank Luntz’s focus-group moderates that responded strongly to Mitt Romney’s commitment to bi-partisan government, as reported by Dick Morris.

While we professionals are trying to win the war of Democrats vs Republicans and blue vs red, the voters just want the war to end and the parties to come to an agreement, guided by the verdict they will deliver on election day.

Earth to voters. You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you. And that goes for some of the dog-on-the-roof liberals I know, the ones that just can’t understand the all the divisiveness. But they, with their bullet-proof government sinecures, can afford to life in fantasy land, and pompously imagine with Oliver Wendell Holmes that with high taxes they buy civilization.

For the rest of us there is no use in whimpering like Falstaff, that “I wish ’twere bedtime, Hal, and all well.” All is not well, and it won’t be for a while.

We conservatives know why. The current ruling class of liberals is just like any other ruling class. It came in a century ago promising to clean up the horror of big-city machines and the “money trust.” Now it runs a national political machine and is the chief sponsor of crony capitalism, and it’s running out of money to bribe its supporters.

The core regime supporters are the famous 47 percent that Mitt Romney gaffed about.

But what about the victims of the liberal ruling class? Let’s call them the “46 percent.” They would be the 46 percent of voters that voted for John McCain in 2008, the rump of people that couldn’t be sold on Hope and Change.

That is what this election is about. It’s the 47 percent, the regime supporters, versus the 46 percent, the regime’s victims, even though many of the 47 percent sucking on the government tit aren’t all going to vote for Obama, and many in the 46 percent are feasting like me on middle-class entitlements.

The truth is that we all have our snouts in the government trough, and none of us are ready to give up our share.

Earth to conservatives. This ain’t gonna be easy. It’s going to take more than electing turnaround artist Mitt Romney to get the economy back on track. You can see why when you look at Europe.

When the welfare state runs out of money, people don’t pitch in and say let’s fix this thing “so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits” again. They start blaming the other guy. They don’t mildly suggest that the rich should pay a little more. They demand that greedy bankers and insurance companies should go to jail.

Let them eat cake, said the ancien régime’s Marie-Antoinette. A la lanterne bawled the Paris mob.

Yep. What you got here, guv’nor, is a pre-revolutionary situation.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Responsible Self

[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


Taking Responsibility

[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact