home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Many Liberals are Naifs and Innocents Obamacare Casts White Working Class Out in the Cold

print view

The "Dark Enlightenment" Hits Gandhi Stage Two

by Christopher Chantrill
January 28, 2014 at 12:00 am


OK, I ADMIT it. I hadn’t really heard anything above a whisper about the Dark Enlightenment until several putdowns appeared recently here here and here.

Huh? I wondered. What are the Daily Telegraph and the American Spectator getting all riled up about?

But I was intrigued. I’d just written a piece that referenced Gandhi’s four stages of political progress. “First they ignore you.” Well that goes without saying. “Then they laugh at you.” Oh really.

So if the guardians of conservative orthodoxy were putting out a bit of ridicule on the Dark Enlightenment front, maybe it was time for me to get up the learning curve direct from “Mencius Moldbug” at Unqualified Reservations and Nick Land at Dark Enlightenment. Not to mention hbd*chick.

If you wonder what all the fuss is about, it centers on HBD, the dangerous notion of Human Biological Diversity, “The set of biological and genetic differences between (and within) groups – specifically, the study of such differences.” Oh no! The liberal blank slate guys won’t like that.

The Dark Enlightenment is trying to create a mind space separate from the dominant liberal worldview. One approach is Moldbug’s argument that the liberals are running a secular established church here in western society. A church, he explains, is “an organization or movement which tells people how to think.” For instance, Harvard. It’s amazing how all the Harvard professors, from Harvard to Stanford on down to your local grade-school teacher, all think and speak alike. And when the music changes, they all pick up the new tune almost without missing a beat. But then you expect that in the bishops, archdeacons and deans of an established church. Moldbug simply calls the church of the academy, the media, the policy analysts, and the cultural production guys in Hollywood “the Cathedral.”

A church does not merely tell people how to think; it also tells them what not to think, and it has ways to persuade people out of their errors. “How to think” correctly used to be called orthodoxy, and “what not to think” used to be called heresy. Today, of course, the orthodox is the politically correct, and heresy is “hate speech” as uttered by the racists, sexists, and homophobes.

Remember all the talk about rebellious youth and heretical thinking, especially about the Sixties? But it doesn’t count as real heresy unless the local Grand Inquisitor can run you out of polite society, show you the instruments of torture and fire up the auto-da-fe, something that never happened to the Sixties radicals like Bill Ayers.

In the progressive era of the 21st century our modern inquisitors have replaced the instruments of torture with the race card. You cannot oppose the Cathedral and put a foot wrong on race. See John Derbyshire and his defenestration over “The Talk, Non-black Version”.

The Dark Enlightenment faces the race issue head on through its interest in HBD. hbdchick has done a bit of reading and proposes that a big difference between the west and the rest is a 1,600 year prohibition of cousin marriage mainly enforced by the Catholic Church. Nick Land:

This distinctive orientation towards outbreeding, [hbdchick] suggests, plausibly accounts for a variety of bio-cultural peculiarities, the most historically significant of which is a unique pre-eminence of reciprocal (over familial) altruism, as indicated by emphatic individualism, nuclear families, an affinity with ‘corporate’ (kinship-free) institutions, highly-developed contractual relationships among strangers, relatively low levels of nepotism / corruption, and robust forms of social cohesion independent of tribal bonds.

This is not neo-fascism but an intriguing idea, and it connects with the fact of early individualism in England and augments Max Weber’s idea that Christianity broke down tribalism in European cities by teaching its adherents to trust non-kin and thus cooperate in “corporate” institutions.

You can see what might be motivating critics to sneer at the Dark Enlightenment. This HBD stuff is pure heresy, for daring to wonder about biodiversity and IQ, and suggesting that there are biological differences between humans, and that the biological differences have real-world consequences. Raacism!

You’d better hurry, you race baiters, because new developments in biology suggests that the coding in our DNA is a lot more complicated that we thought. And who knows where that will end?

But why are conservatives sneering at the Dark Enlightenment? This Dark Enlightenment is “silly not scary,” they tell us. Maybe they want a quiet life and just don’t want to get the attention of the race police and the Grand Inquisitor at the Holy Office of Multiculturalism and True Diversity.

The real question is whether the Dark Enlightenment can get to Gandhi Stage Three: “Then they fight you.” Then we’ll know it’s time to take it seriously.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.




“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact