home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Liberals Have Got What They Asked For Beyond Young Men and Mayhem

print view

Liberals! You are to Blame!

by Christopher Chantrill
March 11, 2014 at 12:00 am


I HAVE BEEN reading a history of the British Glorious Revolution for the last month, and one thing comes through pretty clearly. There weren’t any liberals around back then. They hadn’t been invented.

The new coffee-houses were full of businessmen and merchants. Dr. Johnson, Rousseau, Voltaire? No sign of them yet, because they hadn’t been born.

So the argument in the “political nation” in 1688 centered around two options for Britain. It could follow the Dutch model and create a trading, manufacturing nation at war with France. Or it could follow the French model and create a centralized megastate at war with the Dutch.

The Brits chose what Disraeli later called Dutch finance and French wars and lived happily ever after — at least until Shaw published Fabian Essays in Socialism in the 1880s. That’s my reading of Steve Pincus in 1688: The First Modern Revolution.

But what should we do? As President Obama bombs everywhere from Peoria to Petersburg the anxious pundits are in a tizzy. Robert Kaplan worries about “The Lure of Nationalism,” and the London Economist tries to figure out “What’s Gone Wrong with Democracy?” What are our options?

In the elite view the problem is the people. We should dissolve the people and elect another.

Of course. Liberals believe that the only way for their kind — the creative, educated, evolved, kind — to make the world a better place is for the middle class to be defeated. That’s certainly what the liberals in Fred Siegel’s Revolt Against the Masses all seem to think.

But suppose the opposite is true, that the problem is not the people but the political elite?

Never mind, say the liberals. We, the creative class, the compassionate class, are needed to come like gods among men to protect the traditionally marginalized from the rape of corporate greed.

But when things go wrong these creative intellectuals, these gods among men, are nowhere to be found.

Oh no, they cry. The backward people are getting lured into nationalism. Oh no! Look at the “growing size of the state” and debt-fueled entitlements! What’s wrong with democracy?

Earth to liberals: you are the problem. It was you guys that decided after World War II that the people couldn’t be trusted. So you created the EU and a bunch of supra-national elite-run institutions to cut out nationalism. Now it’s all blowing up. Because “no European demos.”

It was you guys that invented the entitlements and government-run welfare state, because only you were the kind of educated and large-minded people that could be trusted to build and maintain a national social safety net. Only you screwed up your one-size-fits-all fantasy, because Hayek.

Here’s the answer to all your problems, liberals. Give it up. Stop your war on the middle class. Stop your conceit that you are the tribunes of the poor oppressed masses. Stop even the conceit of the classic movie Metropolis that the creative artist is the “heart” that mediates between the bourgeois “head” and the worker’s “hand.”

Here is what liberals can do. You can relax your death grip on the controls of political power, and turn the machinery of government over to the middle class. The middle class may be narrow-minded and backward, but it is responsible and trustworthy, as in “people of the responsible self.”

Your great role, liberals, is to whisper in the ears of the middle class with your brilliant ideas. Usually, the middle class will respond to your ideas with grumbling and complaining, but over years of whispering it will probably go along with the good ideas, and probably filter out the bad ones. Remember, politics is downstream from culture.

What you must not do, liberals, is continue to appeal over the heads of the middle class to the people of the collective self, the people that haven’t yet learned the trick of life and work in the city. Someday your grandchildren, if you have any, will admit that every direct appeal of the creative class to the lower orders has ended up a disaster, from special privileges for labor unions to government education to business regulation to entitlements to socialism. Why? Because all these ideas are pre-modern, pre-individualist, and negate the idea of personal responsibility.

You see liberals, a world without personal responsibility is not a Kumbaya world of fuzzy collective consensus. It is a world wrenched back in time to the rule of the patriarch or its modern derivative, the charismatic lightbringer. In the age of cities, science, markets, commerce, it fails every time it’s been tried.

But you liberals are educated. You already knew that.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.



What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican

Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District

Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State

Taking Responsibility

[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050

Responsible Self

[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph

Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self

Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion

Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact