home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Liberals Digging Their Political Graves Picking on Piketty

print view

Finishing School for Tomorrow's Ruling Class

by Christopher Chantrill
April 29, 2014 at 12:00 am


IT IS REALLY nice that the US Supreme Court is slowly but surely backing away from racist university admissions. As Justice Sotomayer writes, race matters. It matters that the government, in a crude return to pre-modern cultural practice, has been encouraging people for half a century to think of themselves in racial terms rather than national terms. Because racism in a nation state is divisive. That’s the whole point of it. Racism enables tribal leaders to rile up the tribe against the dangerous “other” across town.

But let’s think of this whole sordid business of selecting kids for college in a different way. Let’s think of the whole selective college racket as an astonishingly successful program of “grooming” promising youngsters to take their place as loyal and obedient members of the ruling class.

Of course I am not talking about “grooming” in the way that social scientists describe sex abusers “grooming” their victims. I am just talking about grooms preparing thoroughbreds for the Kentucky Derby.

Scott Rasmussen notes how thoroughly groomed is today’s Supreme Court.

In 1954, the Court that overturned government-sponsored segregation in public schools boasted members with law degrees from the Universities of Indiana, California, Texas and Alabama, along with Columbia, Harvard and Sorbonne. One of the Justices had no law degree whatsoever.

Today, such diversity is nowhere to be found. All nine justices attended either Harvard or Yale for law school.

And then we turn to President Obama. We conservatives like to think of him as an outlier, but really, he is the perfectly groomed liberal. He has all the right liberal instincts, and he doesn’t even have to think about it. The president went to Harvard Law School.

Universities have always been about grooming. Usually, a university has been designed for training priests in the state religion. That’s what Oxford and Cambridge were for. In the US it was the sects that were interested in universities. Harvard was set up by the Massachusetts legislature in 1836 to train Congregationalist ministers. By 1800 Congregationalism was old school, and so Harvard became the center of Unitarianism; by 1850 it had gotten fashionably Boston Transcendentalist. Today, of course, Harvard’s the top seminary for the Church of Secular Liberalism, and it now sends forth well-groomed graduates to minister unto the heathen bitter clingers and the sinful racist-sexist-homophobes. Nothing has changed.

There’s a problem with the grooming culture, and it’s obvious when you think of it. An education in grooming at a selective college prepares you for climbing the greasy pole in the current establishment. But what if life is a bit messier than that?

If you are a well-trained and groomed thoroughbred, all you are good for is running round a well-maintained track. You are good for writing 50-page dissents that demonstrate to the world that you have completely learned teacher’s lesson. But you don’t use a thoroughbred racer for riding over broken ground. You need a versatile, rugged, adaptable mount.

Compare Justice Sotomayer with Harold Hamm, recently profiled in Forbes by Christopher Helman. Oilman Hamm would be the Baron of Bakken and Duke of Dakota, if titles of nobility were permitted in these United States for lords of industry. It is his dogged development of horizontal drilling and fracking that has made North Dakota into the growingest state in the US of A by a country mile.

But the ruling class never got a chance to groom little Harold.

Hamm started working at a gas station at age 16 to support his family, then went on to muck out oil tanks at a refinery and then start his own trucking company hauling water to and from the oilfields. Even today those who respect Hamm still call him “the world’s richest truck driver.”

Wait. Mucking out oil tanks? That’s environmental stewardship! With that on his application, he coulda gone to Harvard!

But then he wouldn’t have been the tough gritty Hamm that followed through on a crazy vision of what could be made to happen in the Bakken formation.

Here’s the problem with our well-groomed ruling class. They can all get down and dirty with the race card or the gender card—after all, what else would Grooming 101 teach them? But they don’t have a clue how to deal with a chap like Vladimir Putin.

And if Harold Hamm had gone to Harvard he probably would have ended up as a green energy crony capitalist.

Here’s what worries me about presidential hopeful Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Princeton and Harvard Law. Does this graduate of the National Grooming Academy really propose to muss up his hair and mud-wrestle the ruling class? Or is it all just an act?

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.



What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican

Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District

Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State

Taking Responsibility

[To make] of each individual member of the army a soldier who, in character, capability, and knowledge, is self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility [verantwortungsfreudig] as a man and a soldier. — Gen. Hans von Seeckt
MacGregor Knox, Williamson Murray, ed., The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050

Responsible Self

[The Axial Age] highlights the conception of a responsible self... [that] promise[s] man for the first time that he can understand the fundamental structure of reality and through salvation participate actively in it.
Robert N Bellah, "Religious Evolution", American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3.


[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph

Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self

Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion

Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact