|Let's Hang the Kaiser Round Obama's Collar||The Ordeal of Post-Obama Change|
by Christopher Chantrill
July 15, 2014 at 12:00 am
THE RESULTS are in. Baby-boomer geezers like me are cleaning up with the Fed’s asset bubble economy, while the working middle class is getting screwed, via regulation, student debt, and the welfare state’s subsidization of idleness.
But at least the oceans are receding and the hills are alive with the sound of music – from wind-turbines.
So let’s screw the banks and the insurance companies and buy local!
Last weekend The Wall Street Journal thoughtfully reviewed its 125 years of free-market advocacy: OK, the editors admit, the Journal got Herbert Hoover wrong. But on the whole they’ve backed freedom all along and equality when it’s about things like ”breaking the government-enforced tyranny of Jim Crow.“ The problem right now is that
President Obama and Nancy Pelosi turned to the old nostrums that government spending can conjure growth, that regulation can productively steer investment, and equality should be the main goal of economic policy.
Over at Forbes Joel Kotkin is asking ”What if they gave a recovery, and the middle class were never invited?“ Says he:
We’ve run an experiment under Bernanke, Bush and Obama to pump up the economy from above, and what we’ve done is squash the aspirations of those middle orders, particularly small business and the self-employed.
He is asking for good ideas from left and right on how to get the economy moving for the middle class.
Reason had the bright idea recently to run a poll to see what the millennials think of it all. The charitable thing to say is that they are confused. Millennials are in favor of Social Security privatization, cutting spending and taxes, and wealth distribution based on achievement. But they are also in favor of raising the minimum wage, guaranteeing access to health care, and increasing taxes on the rich.
Here’s a contradiction. I’ve heard from two acquaintances at Microsoft that they are anxious to patronize small local merchants instead of the big box stores. Maybe the next step for them is to quit Microsoft and start working for a nice little software startup for a lot less money where they can maximize human contact with their co-workers and their clients.
Then there are all the liberals like Alan Colmes confused about the idea of a Republican candidate for Congress suggesting the government has a monopoly on violence. Actually, I prefer the more direct ”government is force.“
It’s natural for a governing class to have forgotten how they came to seize power. Liberals love to blame white males for western colonialism in Africa and the conquest of the Americas. But they don’t seem tto get that their Outrage Industrial Complex practices domination and colonization on ordinary Americans every day of the year. And under Obama it’s got worse.
The other day I was talking to a young millennial who had just completed her master’s in software engineering. She admitted to major confusion on the economic front. She’d taken the requisite macroeconomics course and couldn’t make head or tail of it. Could I help clear up the confusion?
How to begin? Let’s begin with the confused millennials. They want a world based on merit and achievement, but then they also want all the poll-tested welfare-state programs like guaranteed access to health care. Here’s a way out of the confusion. When the government enacts programs to guarantee health care and raise minimum wages it screws up the economy. That’s where macroeconomics comes in. It provides expert knowledge to help the government figure out how to smooth out the unintended consequences of its poll-tested programs.
The problem is the American people. We want stuff, and if we can’t get it from voluntary cooperation we clamor for the government to provide it. We are saying that voluntary cooperation isn’t good enough, so we demand the government to use force to get us what we want. Yes, government is force, even if the liberals in the Outrage Industrial Complex get all insulted when you say so.
Here are a few ideas to clear up the confusion. For our legions of progressives: political power doesn’t lead to prosperity; it just decides who gets to dominate whom.
For the middle class: think about how the Obama economy really works. Super low interest rates that supposedly stimulate the economy just end up in the pockets of the Democrat supporters that write $30,000 checks at Obama’s fundraisers.
For the millennials: think twice before you vote for more government programs. There are a ton of people that have to be paid off before you get a dime. Guess why you are up to your ears in student debt. That money was needed to pay off Democratic-voting teachers and professors before you could get an education.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital