home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

Ferguson: Life in the Promised Land Why Do Peacenik Liberals Make War on Business?

print view

Child Labor Day

by Christopher Chantrill
September 02, 2014 at 12:00 am

|

THERE IS NO more settled principle than the virtue of the laborer. And no greater self-congratulation than we have ended child labor. So when we celebrate Labor Day we congratulate ourselves on the wonderful things we have done to protect working people from exploitation and oppression, and we also congratulate ourselves that our children no longer have to go out to work.

I’m all in favor of work, myself. But I want to remind you of the novelty of work as a Good Thing. Eric Hoffer in The Ordeal of Change:

In practically all civilizations that we know of... work was viewed as a curse, a mark of bondage, or, at best, a necessary evil.

But not to worry, our reactionary liberal friends are working hard to re-indict work. Did not Nancy Pelosi recently extol Obamacare as a way for photographers and artists to quit their day jobs? In our society, it is only the responsible middle class that believes in work. The creative class and the underclass have already reverted back to the old ways.

Since our liberal masters are eager to look back to the past for inspiration let us join them and amaze the world with the idea that children should work.

First of all, let’s be clear about one thing. We moderns only have a problem with children working for pay. It is nothing for us to send our children off to government child custodial facilities for a 12 year stint starting at the tender age of six.

Now, it is some years since I was myself enrolled in a child custody program, but the general impression I get is that government buses prowl the neighborhoods of American cities every morning, snatch millions of kids off the streets and drive them to a government facility where they are groomed to become liberals. After their daily grooming the kids come home and have to do home work.

You will remember that one of the glorious achievements of 19th century reformers was to end the evil of the monstrous “putting-out” system and its home work for adults. But home work for modern children in the 21st century is A-OK.

Here’s a brilliant new idea. If we are going to force kids to work, they should get paid for their labors, just like All-American adults.

I am not suggesting that kids should get paid for attending school, nothing so radical as that. I am suggesting that we allow them to get jobs. For pay.

But what about their education? Oh come on! We all know that the current government system sucks, for everyone except professional-class kids whose parents have the political skill to bend the system to their needs. Let’s allow the rest of the kids to get out into the working world and do something useful.

Here’s my Three Point Program: First, end compulsory schooling so schools can kick out disruptive bullies. Second, allow all kids over 12 to work for wages, same as adults. Third, reform the education system to let working kids come in to take courses to boost their skills at their convenience, not the system’s convenience.

And don’t worry, helicopter parents. You’ll still be able to micromanage your children’s education, breastfeeding through Ph.D.

But won’t the little kiddies get horribly mistreated out in the world of greedy corporate sweat shops? Not necessarily. In the classic “Why Children Work” of 1913, Helen Todd found that children reported being better treated at work than at school. In New York City, that apparently hasn’t changed.

Let’s not give the current system a pass because of Our Teachers; government education has a shameful history. The French did it to counter the Jesuits; the Germans did it to raise up an army and a nation to conquer the French; the Bostonians did it to cure the Irish of their Catholicism; the Progressives did it to turn immigrants into good disciplined factory workers. Today’s liberals want to raise up good little liberals to become “activists” for change in social justice magnet schools.

Here is a radical idea. In America, parents get to raise their children according to their own lights, and parents should have the right to tell the ruling class to take its latest plan to indoctrinate their children and go pound sand.

Yet the current system seems to be designed to make parents helpless and subservient, to force them to surrender their children up to government experts, because of the immense cost of opting out of the government system. And because socialization.

But an education culture of homeschooling, cooperative schooling, and a work-study for teenagers sharply reduces the cost of raising children, and allows parents to cast off the umbilical cord tethering them to the state.

I say bring back child labor.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact