home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |

The Progressives' Thug Agenda I Want a President Who Cares About People Like Me

print view

Charles Murray Wants to Pull Aside the Curtain on Stupid Government

by Christopher Chantrill
May 26, 2015 at 12:00 am

|

IF ANYONE DESERVES a lifetime achievement award in the liberal virtue of “speaking truth to power” it would have to be Charles Murray. Back in the 1980s he wrote Losing Ground to tell the truth that liberals knew, by the mid 1970s, that their Great Society programs weren’t working. But they did nothing to fix them.

Then Murray wrote The Bell Curve with Richard Herrnstein, telling the truth about IQ. For that he got branded as a racist.

So Murray confined his statistics in Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960-2010 to telling the truth about white people. He showed that today’s white cognitive elite is doing fine, but the bottom 30% of whites in “Fishtown” is not. The women don’t marry much and the men don’t work much.

Now in his latest, By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission, Murray is advocating that liberal evergreen: a campaign of “civil disobedience” against a lawless state. Of course, he’s not proposing a conceited liberal campaign of marchin’ and protestin’; he’s just proposing that we gum up the works of the cruel and corrupt administrative state and intimidate its wussy bureaucrats: a reverse Cloward-Piven strategy.

By the People comes in three parts. First Murray tells us why the current political and legal system can’t be reformed, even by a Republican government. Then he tells us what to do about it. Finally he assures us that in a re-diversified America, full of people from all over the world, liberty is the only thing that’s going to work, and it probably will.

Part I is about recognizing the mess we’re in. The Constitution is broke, Murray writes, and politics won’t fix it for a host of reasons, including the fact that you can’t roll back the benefit state. He re-tells the story of the failed Progressive fantasy of a state led by “disinterested experts.” It’s developed into the regulatory state with unlimited power to sweep down on any individual or business and drop the hammer on him. If you fight the Man he can destroy you; any mid-level bureaucrat can say to you: “You do that, and we’ll put you out of business.” If you want more details, I’m blogging By the People here.

Part II of By the People lays out Murray’s cunning plan to fight back and gum up the works of the government’s regulatory machine. He wants to turn the tables on that mid-level bureaucrat, and say to him: You touch me and I’ll make your nice secure job a hell. The big idea is to establish a “Madison Fund” to protect “ordinary Americans who are being victimized by the regulatory state.” It would operate on the model of conservative outfits like the Pacific Legal Foundation. It would tell the government:

We are taking over this man’s case. We will litigate it as long as it takes. We will publicize that litigation in ways that will embarrass you and your superiors. None of this will cost our client a penny, and we will reimburse him for any fine you are able to impose.

All it needs is “just one wealthy American... and a few hundred million dollars.”

The cunning of the Madison Fund idea is that the government can’t descend on all of us at once. It only has limited enforcement agents to execute on the terrorist principle of DESTROYING one person to frighten a million. The Madison Fund would reverse the process, humiliating one bureaucrat in order to frighten ten thousand of them.

I’d say the only question is the old one. Which one of those billionaire mice is going to be the one to bell the regulatory cat? He’d better be a guy with unimaginable cojones. If you wonder why, just say “Koch Brothers” to yourself.

In Part III in Of the People Murray wants to talk about what’s in our stars in the big picture, beginning with the return of a diversified America. Murray reminds us that North America started with a diverse crew of Puritans, Quakers, Cavaliers, and Scots-Irish that hated and despised each other. The only time the US was not diverse was in the wake of immigration restrictions between 1925 and 1965.

Murray is optimistic about the future. He thinks that the internet and the Ubers are undermining the power and the attractions of the administrative state.

Murray looks forward to a time when conservatives, liberals and “Madisonians” like himself could combine in “common cause against stupid government.” Because stupid government is “ridiculous” in all kinds of ways.

Is all this happy talk just a pipe dream? Probably, but a successful push-back by a Madison Fund against the regulatory state could be a strategic move that alters the correlation of forces. And that would be a start.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


presented by Christopher Chantrill

Data Sources  •   •  Contact