|The Dem Problem. They Don't Do Mojo Any More||Fighting Back Against the SJWs|
by Christopher Chantrill
August 25, 2015 at 12:00 am
THEY HAVE FINALLY dragged old political war-horse Jeff Greenfield out of the pasture and saddled him up to warn Democrats of their “Democratic Blues.” Nobody knows what President Obama’s policy legacy will be, writes Jeff, but his political legacy is clear: the president is going to leave the Democrats in their “worst shape since the Great Depression—even if Hillary wins.”
Well, Greenfield has a point. There’s still a chance that Democratic historians will manage to whitewash the president’s disastrously divisive policy failures as brilliant successes.
But I’d say that the obvious distemper of the US voters — not to mention European voters — shows that the liberal ruling class fell off the wall during the Obama presidency, and the Democratic operatives with bylines won’t be able to put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
We conservatives have known it forever, but now ordinary Americans are coming to realize it. Our modern ruling class sucks.
Our ruling class worries endlessly about far-right extremism and nationalism but is too vapid and pompous to realize that ordinary people don’t go for extremism and nationalism unless the ruling class has messed up — like after World War I with the Great Depression and right now with a fragile economy and unassimilated immigrants flooding many western cities.
Don’t worry about another Hitler, ruling class. Just worry about you, the ruling class, screwing up.
The central fact of the last 200 years is what Deirdre McCloskey calls the Great Enrichment, the 30-fold increase in the income of the average person in the capitalist world. There has never been anything like it, ever.
So you would think that a wise ruling class would spend all its days mastering the theory and the practice of the Great Enrichment so that they could help pour its bounty into the arms of their grateful subjects. But it didn’t. McCloskey.
Yet after 1848 a virulent aversion to the bourgeoisie infected the mass of artists, journalists, professionals, bureaucrats, and intellectuals, the “clerisy” as it was called in 1818 by Coleridge... In the eighteenth century the members of the clerisy such as Voltaire and Tom Paine had courageously advocated our liberties. But in the 1830s and 1840s a much enlarged clerisy, mostly the sons of bourgeois fathers, commenced sneering at the liberties the fathers exercised so vigorously in the market and the factory.
And the clerisy decided that it knew better than the bourgeoisie. With its power and politics it would protect the poor helpless lower class from the ravening capitalist beast that... oh, wait, the ravenous capitalist beast was enriching the lower classes like nothing before in history.
That is the basic disconnect in the modern world. Our ruling class is proudly trying to protect people from the very thing that is transforming them from poverty into affluence.
No wonder it sucks.
Let’s review. The ruling class thinks that only it and its bribed apologists are evolved and educated enough to prevent another Hitler. But Hitler only got his opportunity because the German ruling class of the time totally screwed things up for the German people with a stupid war and a chaotic peace.
Our clueless ruling class spends thirty years forcing banks to flood the country with “affordable housing” mortgages, and then blames the bankers when the bubble bursts.
Our clueless ruling class spends half a century flooding the west with immigrants and playing identity politics with them. Then it is shocked, shocked when the voters start flocking to candidates that promise to put a stop to it.
Anyone for Hitler, ruling class?
Of course it’s a bit late to talk about what our ruling class should have done.
But they might have thought about how Bismarck’s cunning social insurance schemes didn’t end up saving Hohenzollern dynasty. So why should the administrative welfare state and its Ponzi benefit schemes and its unrestricted immigration save the present ruling class from oblivion?
A wise and thoughtful ruling class would not have built an administrative welfare state to create jobs for liberals; they would not have angried up blacks and women and successive waves of immigrants with reactionary identity politics; they would not have attacked bourgeois culture and religion and marriage.
Why would a bunch of “artists, journalists, professionals, bureaucrats, and intellectuals” think they had anything to tell the world-historical bourgeoisie?
Yet now, all of a sudden, veteran Jeff Greenfield is called out to worry about the Obama policy legacy? Now, despite all assurances, voters all across the west are rebelling against the failed establishment political parties?
Now, all of a sudden, our ruling class sits uneasily on its administrative throne?
Who could have seen it coming?
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up
rather than learns... Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism